This is Guardianlies.com


Guardian Lie No.11

Main Index to all Sections

Section Three Index:
The Guardian's liars and their lies

To understand this evidence in context read "The concise true story of the 'cash for questions' affair, situated in Section Two



Hard-Left journalist accuses Tory MPs of subverting democracy for cash and then gets caught perverting trial for £10,000 shock!!

Former Observer and Granada TV journalist Mark Hollingsworth

Mark Hollingsworth

Introduction to Guardian Lie No. 11

Former Observer and Granada TV World in Action journalist Mark Hollingsworth has made something of a career out of investigating and collating information on Conservative MPs' outside business interests.  Indeed, since he and David Leigh took their first Tory scalp together (former MP for Winchester John Browne)*, Hollingsworth has researched at least three Granada TV documentaries about Conservatives' outside interests, and authored two books and written endless articles on the subject for Punch magazine under Mohamed Al Fayed's ownership.
    Invariably he implies that Conservative MPs who have such interests are greedy and incapable of acting honourably as Members of Parliament: "Democracy is being subverted", says he.  But though many Labour MPs also have outside interests, Hollingsworth merely mentions these in passing (if at all). 
    Given all the foregoing, it takes hypocrisy to new, stupefying, stratospheric heights that Hollingsworth should then go on and take a leading role in a conspiracy to pervert Neil Hamilton's 1999 High Court Libel action against Mohamed Al Fayed, by selling to Fayed, for £10,000 cash, confidential draft cross-examination documents stolen from outside the chambers of Neil Hamilton's barristers - and that he should then swindle his collaborator, who had actually taken the most risk.
[
*See Hollingsworth's profile within the document entitled "The Webs they Weave", also in Section Three.]

THE EVIDENCE

'For the past four months World in Action has been investigating MPs' commercial interests...  "I think they (the public) would be nothing less than appalled if they knew the extent to which their MPs were in the pockets of those able to buy them," said Professor Graham Zellick...
    Some MPs maintain that having consultancies, shares and directorships helps 'broaden their interests' and gives them 'knowledge of the business world'. 
But according to our research, the real motive is quite clear: they do it for the money…
    World In Action will be shown on Monday 15th January on ITV'

Taken from an article written by Mark Hollingsworth, entitled "Minding their own business" and published in The Guardian on 11 January 1990.  The article trails Hollingsworth's own World in Action documentary entitled "MPs for Hire", broadcast the following Monday.

'MANY MPs can easily double their £28,970 salary by taking on lucrative consultancies and directorships, according to a book, MPs for Hire, to be published on Monday…
    The book by television researcher, Mark Hollingsworth, says the largest number of directorships were held by Lord Rippon…  MPs are not required to disclose the salaries or director fees on the register of interests… 
    
Mr Hollingsworth concludes: "To what extent a hired MP can directly initiate, change or repeal legislation is very difficult to evaluate.  The real issue is that many MPs have placed 'for sale' signs against their names.  By accepting payments from outside bodies, they are subverting democracy when they are supposed to be its custodians." '

Taken from an article entitled 'Double-pay bonanza outside the House', written by David Hencke and published in The Guardian on 27 September 1991.  The article trails the publication of Hollingsworth's book on Conservative MPs' outside interests 'MPs for hire'.

'...a Conservative MP, who has a directorship and three consultancies, was asked by a Channel 4 programme whether he should declare how much he earns from his outside business interests.  "That's a matter between me and the Inland Revenue, he replied dismissively"  …
…  It is this potential conflict of loyalties between an MP's private financial interests and his or her public duties that undermines confidence in our democracy…'

Taken from the introduction to Hollingsworth's second book on Conservative MPs' outside interests, entitled 'A Bit on the Side', published on 4 April 1994.

'AN official investigation has started into allegations that Mohamed Al Fayed paid £10,000 for copies of stolen documents which gave him advance warning of the lines of questioning he would face in his libel battle with Neil Hamilton…
    An associate of Al Fayed, Mark Hollingsworth, last night admitted he handed over the material and accepted the cash
during a clandestine meeting at the Egyptian tycoon's Harrods store.  Al Fayed was so delighted that he promised another £10,000 for further material.  It gave Al Fayed 'a bit of a steer' into what he would be asked by Hamilton's lawyer, said Hollingsworth…
    The papers were initially taken by Benjamin Pell…  Pell passed the documents to Mark Hollingsworth, a freelance writer with close links to Al Fayed.  Hollingsworth set up a meeting at Harrods…  Al Fayed joined the meeting and appeared intrigued and pleased by the delivery of the papers.  Hollingsworth said last night that he was given £10,000 and was told that he would get a further £10,000 for any additional papers…  He insisted last night that he passed all the money to Pell…  Pell, however, claimed last night that he was paid only £5,000…  After the case, Hollingsworth admits he met with Al Fayed and asked for more cash…'

Taken from the Mail on Sunday of 13 February 2000, reporting how Hollingsworth had sold to Fayed, for £10,000 cash, reams of draft cross examination documents left in waste sacks for secure disposal outside the chambers of Hamilton's barristers, but taken by Benjamin 'the binman Pell.  Pell later alleged that he had taken the waste sacks at the request of David Leigh - The Guardian's comment editor and Hollingsworth's longstanding friend from their days together at the Observer between 1987 and 1988.

Previous lie

This web page is situated in Guardianlies.com/Section Three: The Guardian's liars and their lies

Help promote this website with a donation from as little as £1 or $1 - and spread the word

Help expose The Guardian's corrupt journalism and anti-democratic influence